← All essays

APRIL 21, 2026

Vouchers aren't a discount strategy. They're a product feature.

What changed when we stopped treating vouchers as margin leakage and started designing them as the activation loop itself.

For most of my career I treated vouchers the way most growth teams do: as a CRM lever for closing gaps. Campaign coming up short? Push a voucher. Cohort going cold? Push a voucher. The metric was redemption rate, and redemption rate, it turns out, is a vanity metric.

The reframe took me longer than it should have.

The old model

In the old model the voucher belonged to the CRM team. The design was: pick an audience, pick a discount, pick a window, send it, measure redemptions. Margin was the cost; redemption was the win.

Three problems with this:

  • The same audience habituates to the voucher inside two quarters
  • The team responds by increasing the discount, compressing margin without lifting behavior
  • The success metric never connects to the business outcome the voucher was supposed to drive

What we changed

The reframe was small in language and large in consequence: a voucher is a product trigger, not a marketing payload.

That sentence moved ownership. The CRM team still executed, but the Product team designed the trigger logic. The metric became downstream behavior — second transaction, feature adoption, recovered habit — not the redemption itself.

The mechanism that drove the lift

A voucher should answer a product question the user hasn't asked yet. "Try this feature you've ignored." "Send your second transfer before the friction sets in." "Recover the habit you almost dropped."

When you frame it that way, three design rules fall out:

  • Tie every voucher to a specific user state, not a calendar
  • Measure the behavior the voucher was meant to unlock, not the redemption
  • If the same user gets the same voucher twice, the trigger logic is broken

The team running it well operates more like a product squad than a campaign team.

The result that wasn't the point

We ran this reframe at a fintech I led growth for. The activation curve moved sharply — a 400% uplift in first-transaction conversion. The headline number was the easy story.

The interesting story was the spend curve. Voucher spend went down over the same window, because the trigger logic stopped firing on users who weren't going to convert anyway. The product had absorbed the lever.

That's the test. If your voucher program is working and your spend on it is growing in lockstep with revenue, you're still in the old model. If spend flattens or drops while behavior moves, the voucher has become a feature.

Most teams are still in the old model. That's the opportunity.

Got a growth problem worth a real conversation?

I respond within two business days. No discovery-call gauntlet.

Email Andre →
Built with v0